CELEBRITY
🚨 BREAKING: The FBI has spent nearly $1 million in overtime using taxpayer funds to redact the Epstein files, including the names of clients.
🚨 BREAKING: The FBI has spent nearly $1 million in overtime using taxpayer funds to redact the Epstein files, including the names of clients.
Just Exposed: FBI Burns Taxpayer Cash to Black Out Epstein Clients — Dig Into the Details
FBI Overtime Costs Raise Questions Over Epstein Files Redactions**
Reports circulating this week claim that the FBI has spent close to $1 million in overtime pay to review and redact records connected to the Jeffrey Epstein investigation, with taxpayer funds covering the cost. According to these reports, a significant portion of the work involved removing sensitive information, including the names of individuals identified as potential clients or associates.
Federal officials have long maintained that redactions are necessary to comply with privacy laws, protect ongoing investigations, and avoid releasing unverified allegations that could harm individuals who were never charged with a crime. Supporters of the FBI’s actions argue that large-scale document reviews are labor-intensive and legally complex, often requiring senior agents and legal staff to work extended hours.
Critics, however, say the reported cost highlights a lack of transparency and accountability. They question why taxpayers should bear such a high expense to obscure information in a case that has already sparked widespread public distrust in powerful institutions. Some lawmakers and advocacy groups are calling for greater disclosure and independent oversight to ensure redactions are justified and not used to shield influential figures from scrutiny.
The FBI has not publicly confirmed the exact overtime figure but has reiterated that all document handling follows federal law and court guidance. As public interest in the Epstein case remains intense, the debate over transparency versus legal obligation is likely to continue.
“You Won’t Believe What Just Happened in Washington!” TRUMP CASE DRAWS SUPREME COURT SPOTLIGHT AS JACK SMITH’S NEW EVIDENCE COMPLICATES IMMUNITY DEBATE
B.O.O.M! Barbra Streisand Just Set the Internet on Fire — and Washington Is Shaking!
FEDERAL JUDGE SLAMS THE DOOR ON TRUMP’S VOTER SUPPRESSION PLOT — “THE PRESIDENT GETS NO SAY.”
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy says at least 55,000 soldiers have died during fighting four years on from the start of Russia’s invasion, up from the 46,000 troops he said had been killed in early 2025.
THIS ONE IS ON FIRE 🔥 The internet can’t stop arguing over this graphic claiming Sen. Mark Kelly said Trump “hasn’t done anything for the American people.” Hold up — didn’t do anything? Let’s check those receipts. 👀 Supporters immediately point to:
Time to revisit the question. With some distance and perspective, do you support Donald Trump’s decision to move against Venezuelan strongman Nicolás Maduro? Supporters argue it was a firm stand against authoritarianism, corruption, and human rights abuses. Critics warn about escalation and foreign entanglements. Either way, it highlights a broader debate about America’s role in confronting dictators abroad. Where do you stand now? 👇
Kaitlin Collins is a badass. A journalist that’s not afraid to ask pertinent questions and doesn’t allow crooked politicians to demean her. She is also a wonderful role model for young women and girls. That’s way more than we can say about anyone in the White House in 2026.
TRUMP TAKES ON CRIME — AND DELIVERS! 💥 President Trump says his focus is the “2%” who commit the majority of crimes, and targeting repeat offenders is already dropping violence in key U.S. cities.
BREAKING NEWS: U.S. Lumber Tariffs Backfire as Canada Triggers Chaos in America’s Housing Market
Newly released documents reference Donald Trump more than one thousand times, prompting renewed scrutiny of his past social connections. Trump has insisted he was not close to the late financier at the center of the records and denied any wrongdoing.
