CELEBRITY
BREAKING: ICE officials are reportedly worried that, if Congress requires ICE agents to unmask and wear identification, 75% of the agents will quit rather than be ostracised for the rest of their lives by family, friends, employers, and society.
BREAKING: ICE officials are reportedly worried that, if Congress requires ICE agents to unmask and wear identification, 75% of the agents will quit rather than be ostracised for the rest of their lives by family, friends, employers, and society.
U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officials are reportedly expressing concern over a possible congressional requirement that agents wear visible identification and remove face coverings while on duty. According to accounts of internal discussions, some agency leaders fear that such a mandate could prompt a significant number of agents to leave the force, citing personal safety risks and long-term social consequences.
Officials who oppose the proposal argue that unmasking agents would expose them and their families to harassment, threats, and social ostracism, particularly in an era of heightened political polarization. Some have suggested—without releasing supporting data—that as many as three-quarters of agents might consider resigning rather than operate under those conditions. ICE has not publicly confirmed that figure, and no independent analysis has verified the claim.
Advocates for transparency, however, say visible identification is a standard accountability measure used by many law-enforcement agencies and is essential for public trust and oversight. Members of Congress considering the proposal have emphasized the need to balance agent safety with civil liberties and clear identification during enforcement actions. As debate continues, lawmakers have yet to indicate whether the requirement will advance or how concerns from ICE personnel would be addressed.
FEDERAL JUDGE SLAMS THE DOOR ON TRUMP’S VOTER SUPPRESSION PLOT — “THE PRESIDENT GETS NO SAY.”
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy says at least 55,000 soldiers have died during fighting four years on from the start of Russia’s invasion, up from the 46,000 troops he said had been killed in early 2025.
THIS ONE IS ON FIRE 🔥 The internet can’t stop arguing over this graphic claiming Sen. Mark Kelly said Trump “hasn’t done anything for the American people.” Hold up — didn’t do anything? Let’s check those receipts. 👀 Supporters immediately point to:
Time to revisit the question. With some distance and perspective, do you support Donald Trump’s decision to move against Venezuelan strongman Nicolás Maduro? Supporters argue it was a firm stand against authoritarianism, corruption, and human rights abuses. Critics warn about escalation and foreign entanglements. Either way, it highlights a broader debate about America’s role in confronting dictators abroad. Where do you stand now? 👇
Kaitlin Collins is a badass. A journalist that’s not afraid to ask pertinent questions and doesn’t allow crooked politicians to demean her. She is also a wonderful role model for young women and girls. That’s way more than we can say about anyone in the White House in 2026.
TRUMP TAKES ON CRIME — AND DELIVERS! 💥 President Trump says his focus is the “2%” who commit the majority of crimes, and targeting repeat offenders is already dropping violence in key U.S. cities.
BREAKING NEWS: U.S. Lumber Tariffs Backfire as Canada Triggers Chaos in America’s Housing Market
Newly released documents reference Donald Trump more than one thousand times, prompting renewed scrutiny of his past social connections. Trump has insisted he was not close to the late financier at the center of the records and denied any wrongdoing.
WASHINGTON ERUPTS: KRISTI NOEM HIT WITH IMPEACHMENT AS HOUSE VOTE IGNITES POLITICAL INFERNO
President Donald Trump suggested he could pursue legal action against author Michael Wolff, alleging that Wolff and the late Jeffrey Epstein were “conspiring” to harm him politically.
