BREAKING: JUSTICE IS SERVED — AND THIS TIME, NO ONE IS ABOVE THE LAW.

BREAKING: JUSTICE IS SERVED — AND THIS TIME, NO ONE IS ABOVE THE LAW.

A jury has found Milwaukee County Judge Hannah Dugan GUILTY of obstructing federal immigration agents who were attempting to carry out a lawful court order.

Back in April, Dugan was arrested after quietly helping an illegal immigrant — and his attorney — slip out a back door, once she learned ICE agents were inside the courthouse waiting to make an arrest.
Not an accident. Not confusion. A deliberate choice.

Now, the woman who once passed judgment on others is facing up to 5 years in prison — and the bigger question looms:
If judges break the law, who’s left to defend justice?

No Robes, No Immunity: A Courtroom Shockwaves the Legal System Today

## **BREAKING: Judge Hannah Dugan Found Guilty of Obstructing Federal Immigration Agents — A Rare Judicial Conviction**

A federal jury in Milwaukee on Thursday convicted **Milwaukee County Circuit Court Judge Hannah Dugan** of **felony obstruction** for interfering with federal immigration agents attempting to execute a lawful arrest at the county courthouse. ([AP News][1])

The case stems from an April 18 incident in which Dugan, while presiding over court, allegedly **directed an undocumented defendant and his attorney through a private exit** after learning that U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents were waiting outside to arrest him. Prosecutors argued that her actions **disrupted federal agents’ authority and impeded an official proceeding**.

Dugan was **acquitted on a related misdemeanor charge** of concealing a person to prevent an arrest but faces up to **five years in prison** on the felony conviction, a significant sentence that has not yet been scheduled.

The defendant involved — a Mexican national identified in court records — was later **taken into federal custody after a brief pursuit** and has since been deported.

The verdict has ignited **national debate**. Supporters of the prosecution say the trial underscores that **no one, not even a judge, is above the law**. Critics — including legal advocates and some civil liberties organizations — argue the case raises serious questions about **judicial independence and the appropriate balance between state courts and federal immigration enforcement**.

Dugan’s legal team has already signaled plans to **seek a new trial or appeal**, with defense attorneys maintaining that she was following courthouse protocols and did not intend to obstruct justice.

The conviction marks a rare moment in U.S. legal history where a sitting judge has been found guilty of obstruction in connection with immigration enforcement, highlighting ongoing tensions in how federal immigration laws are applied at the local level.