CELEBRITY
The Department of Education announced a “comprehensive review” of federal contracts and grants for Harvard University as part of an effort to combat antisemitism on campuses.
The Department of Education recently announced a “comprehensive review” of federal contracts and government-funded grants at Harvard University, which is part of an investigation to eliminate antisemitism on campuses.
The efforts, on behalf of the Joint Task Force to Combat Antisemitism, are being launched in accordance with the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and the U.S. General Services Administration (GSA).
Its primary goal is to “eliminat[e] anti-Semitic [sic] harassment on college campuses,” which has proliferated amid the Israel-Hamas war and pro-Palestinian protests at universities.
In a press release on Monday, the Department of Education said that over $255.6 million in contracts between Harvard, its affiliates and the federal government will be reviewed, plus nearly $9 billion worth of grants.
“The review also includes the more than $8.7 billion in multi-year grant commitments to Harvard University and its affiliates to ensure the university is in compliance with federal regulations, including its civil rights responsibilities,” the agency described.Any institution found to be in violation of federal compliance standards may face administrative actions, including contract termination.”
In a statement, Secretary of Education Linda McMahon said that Harvard’s reputation was “in serious jeopardy” over the prevalence of antisemitism on campus.
“Harvard has served as a symbol of the American Dream for generations — the pinnacle aspiration for students all over the world to work hard and earn admission to the storied institution,” McMahon’s statement read.
“Harvard’s failure to protect students on campus from anti-Semitic [sic] discrimination — all while promoting divisive ideologies over free inquiry — has put its reputation in serious jeopardy.
“Harvard can right these wrongs and restore itself to a campus dedicated to academic excellence and truth-seeking, where all students feel safe on its campus.”
“You Won’t Believe What Just Happened in Washington!” TRUMP CASE DRAWS SUPREME COURT SPOTLIGHT AS JACK SMITH’S NEW EVIDENCE COMPLICATES IMMUNITY DEBATE
B.O.O.M! Barbra Streisand Just Set the Internet on Fire — and Washington Is Shaking!
FEDERAL JUDGE SLAMS THE DOOR ON TRUMP’S VOTER SUPPRESSION PLOT — “THE PRESIDENT GETS NO SAY.”
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy says at least 55,000 soldiers have died during fighting four years on from the start of Russia’s invasion, up from the 46,000 troops he said had been killed in early 2025.
THIS ONE IS ON FIRE 🔥 The internet can’t stop arguing over this graphic claiming Sen. Mark Kelly said Trump “hasn’t done anything for the American people.” Hold up — didn’t do anything? Let’s check those receipts. 👀 Supporters immediately point to:
Time to revisit the question. With some distance and perspective, do you support Donald Trump’s decision to move against Venezuelan strongman Nicolás Maduro? Supporters argue it was a firm stand against authoritarianism, corruption, and human rights abuses. Critics warn about escalation and foreign entanglements. Either way, it highlights a broader debate about America’s role in confronting dictators abroad. Where do you stand now? 👇
Kaitlin Collins is a badass. A journalist that’s not afraid to ask pertinent questions and doesn’t allow crooked politicians to demean her. She is also a wonderful role model for young women and girls. That’s way more than we can say about anyone in the White House in 2026.
TRUMP TAKES ON CRIME — AND DELIVERS! 💥 President Trump says his focus is the “2%” who commit the majority of crimes, and targeting repeat offenders is already dropping violence in key U.S. cities.
BREAKING NEWS: U.S. Lumber Tariffs Backfire as Canada Triggers Chaos in America’s Housing Market
Newly released documents reference Donald Trump more than one thousand times, prompting renewed scrutiny of his past social connections. Trump has insisted he was not close to the late financier at the center of the records and denied any wrongdoing.
