CELEBRITY
JUST IN: 21 FEDERAL JUDGES DECLARE T.R.U.M.P A “SERIOUS THREAT” — PRESIDENT FACES EMERGENCY IMPEACHMENT WITH 7 CHARGES Judges BREAK protocol, accuse D0nald T.r.u.m.p of ABUSE, OBSTRUCTION, and THREATS to democracy — forcing a shock Senate vote with SEVEN impeachment articles. Unprecedented power play, media scrambling, truth buried Full story in comments 👇
JUST IN: 21 FEDERAL JUDGES DECLARE T.R.U.M.P A “SERIOUS THREAT” — PRESIDENT FACES EMERGENCY IMPEACHMENT WITH 7 CHARGES
Judges BREAK protocol, accuse D0nald T.r.u.m.p of ABUSE, OBSTRUCTION, and THREATS to democracy — forcing a shock Senate vote with SEVEN impeachment articles. Unprecedented power play, media scrambling, truth buried
A sensational post circulating online claims that 21 federal judges have declared former President Donald Trump a “serious threat” and triggered an “emergency impeachment” with seven charges. The assertion has spread rapidly across social media, prompting confusion and urgent reactions—but there is no evidence to support it.
Legal experts and court officials say the claim misunderstands how the U.S. judiciary and impeachment process work. Federal judges do not issue collective political declarations about individuals, and they are bound by strict ethics rules that prohibit public commentary on partisan matters. Impeachment, meanwhile, can only be initiated by the U.S. House of Representatives, not the courts, and there has been no emergency vote or new set of impeachment articles announced by congressional leadership.
Major news organizations report that no such statement from judges exists, and no official court filing, congressional resolution, or Senate schedule reflects the described events. The language in the viral post—suggesting protocol-breaking judges, secret votes, and “truth buried”—mirrors common misinformation tactics designed to create urgency and distrust without verifiable sources.
While debates about accountability and the rule of law continue in public forums, officials urge readers to rely on confirmed reporting and primary sources. As of now, the claim remains unsubstantiated, and no emergency impeachment is underway.
“You Won’t Believe What Just Happened in Washington!” TRUMP CASE DRAWS SUPREME COURT SPOTLIGHT AS JACK SMITH’S NEW EVIDENCE COMPLICATES IMMUNITY DEBATE
B.O.O.M! Barbra Streisand Just Set the Internet on Fire — and Washington Is Shaking!
FEDERAL JUDGE SLAMS THE DOOR ON TRUMP’S VOTER SUPPRESSION PLOT — “THE PRESIDENT GETS NO SAY.”
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy says at least 55,000 soldiers have died during fighting four years on from the start of Russia’s invasion, up from the 46,000 troops he said had been killed in early 2025.
THIS ONE IS ON FIRE 🔥 The internet can’t stop arguing over this graphic claiming Sen. Mark Kelly said Trump “hasn’t done anything for the American people.” Hold up — didn’t do anything? Let’s check those receipts. 👀 Supporters immediately point to:
Time to revisit the question. With some distance and perspective, do you support Donald Trump’s decision to move against Venezuelan strongman Nicolás Maduro? Supporters argue it was a firm stand against authoritarianism, corruption, and human rights abuses. Critics warn about escalation and foreign entanglements. Either way, it highlights a broader debate about America’s role in confronting dictators abroad. Where do you stand now? 👇
Kaitlin Collins is a badass. A journalist that’s not afraid to ask pertinent questions and doesn’t allow crooked politicians to demean her. She is also a wonderful role model for young women and girls. That’s way more than we can say about anyone in the White House in 2026.
TRUMP TAKES ON CRIME — AND DELIVERS! 💥 President Trump says his focus is the “2%” who commit the majority of crimes, and targeting repeat offenders is already dropping violence in key U.S. cities.
BREAKING NEWS: U.S. Lumber Tariffs Backfire as Canada Triggers Chaos in America’s Housing Market
Newly released documents reference Donald Trump more than one thousand times, prompting renewed scrutiny of his past social connections. Trump has insisted he was not close to the late financier at the center of the records and denied any wrongdoing.
