CELEBRITY
JUST IN: 50 minutes ago: Special Counsel Jack Smith disclosed that all materials in his possession connected to Trump have been released publicly, a move framed explicitly as an effort to reinforce transparency and institutional credibility…
JUST IN: 50 minutes ago: Special Counsel Jack Smith disclosed that all materials in his possession connected to Trump have been released publicly, a move framed explicitly as an effort to reinforce transparency and institutional credibility…
Special Counsel Jack Smith Says All Trump-Related Materials in His Possession Have Now Been Publicly Released
*WASHINGTON –* In a move underscoring his stated commitment to transparency and trust in federal institutions, Special Counsel Jack Smith announced today that **all materials in his possession connected to former President Donald Trump’s investigations have been released to the public**.
According to Smith’s statement, the release was completed minutes ago — approximately 50 minutes before this report — and includes all evidence, filings, and related documents that his office had compiled during the course of the Trump probes. The special counsel’s office said the action was taken to **reinforce transparency and bolster public confidence in the investigative process**, particularly amid ongoing debates over accountability and political influence in federal prosecutions.
The disclosure comes after months of legal and political contention over what information should be made public, with Trump allies and some congressional Republicans arguing that withholding material served to shield the former president, and critics of Trump pushing for fuller disclosure. In previous congressional testimony, Smith highlighted the strength of the evidence his team had developed in two major investigations of Trump — one examining efforts to overturn the 2020 election and another involving the handling of classified documents — stating that prosecutors had amassed “proof beyond a reasonable doubt” in support of potential charges.
Smith’s decision to release all materials contrasts with earlier periods during the investigations when parts of the record were kept under seal or were only partially unsealed after court rulings. In some past instances, judges ruled that certain filings — such as a roughly 1,800-page appendix of evidence — should be made public despite objections from Trump’s defense team.
Justice Department officials have declined to comment beyond the special counsel’s announcement, but the move is likely to reignite debates among lawmakers, legal experts, and political commentators about the balance between openness in high-stakes legal matters and the protections needed for grand jury secrecy, ongoing prosecutions, and national security.
Critics of the release say that making every investigatory document public could jeopardize legal processes or create opportunities for selective interpretation. Supporters argue that full transparency — particularly in cases involving a recent president and a deeply divided nation — is essential for maintaining credibility in the rule of law.
As reactions begin pouring in from both sides of the political spectrum, the broader impact of today’s disclosure on public trust and future legal proceedings remains to be seen.
“You Won’t Believe What Just Happened in Washington!” TRUMP CASE DRAWS SUPREME COURT SPOTLIGHT AS JACK SMITH’S NEW EVIDENCE COMPLICATES IMMUNITY DEBATE
B.O.O.M! Barbra Streisand Just Set the Internet on Fire — and Washington Is Shaking!
FEDERAL JUDGE SLAMS THE DOOR ON TRUMP’S VOTER SUPPRESSION PLOT — “THE PRESIDENT GETS NO SAY.”
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy says at least 55,000 soldiers have died during fighting four years on from the start of Russia’s invasion, up from the 46,000 troops he said had been killed in early 2025.
THIS ONE IS ON FIRE 🔥 The internet can’t stop arguing over this graphic claiming Sen. Mark Kelly said Trump “hasn’t done anything for the American people.” Hold up — didn’t do anything? Let’s check those receipts. 👀 Supporters immediately point to:
Time to revisit the question. With some distance and perspective, do you support Donald Trump’s decision to move against Venezuelan strongman Nicolás Maduro? Supporters argue it was a firm stand against authoritarianism, corruption, and human rights abuses. Critics warn about escalation and foreign entanglements. Either way, it highlights a broader debate about America’s role in confronting dictators abroad. Where do you stand now? 👇
Kaitlin Collins is a badass. A journalist that’s not afraid to ask pertinent questions and doesn’t allow crooked politicians to demean her. She is also a wonderful role model for young women and girls. That’s way more than we can say about anyone in the White House in 2026.
TRUMP TAKES ON CRIME — AND DELIVERS! 💥 President Trump says his focus is the “2%” who commit the majority of crimes, and targeting repeat offenders is already dropping violence in key U.S. cities.
BREAKING NEWS: U.S. Lumber Tariffs Backfire as Canada Triggers Chaos in America’s Housing Market
Newly released documents reference Donald Trump more than one thousand times, prompting renewed scrutiny of his past social connections. Trump has insisted he was not close to the late financier at the center of the records and denied any wrongdoing.
