CELEBRITY
Sen. Mark Kelly said he will vote against Department of Homeland Security funding, criticizing the use of masked federal agents operating on U.S. streets. In a post on X, Kelly said such actions lack accountability and are “un-American.” Urging public action, he called on concerned citizens to contact their senators and representatives and demand an end to what he described as growing chaos in federal enforcement.
Sen. Mark Kelly said he will vote against Department of Homeland Security funding, criticizing the use of masked federal agents operating on U.S. streets. In a post on X, Kelly said such actions lack accountability and are “un-American.” Urging public action, he called on concerned citizens to contact their senators and representatives and demand an end to what he described as growing chaos in federal enforcement.
Sen. Mark Kelly announced that he will vote against funding for the Department of Homeland Security, citing concerns over the deployment of masked federal agents on U.S. streets. In a statement posted on X, the Arizona Democrat said such practices undermine transparency and accountability, calling them “un-American.”
Kelly argued that the presence of unidentified federal officers erodes public trust in law enforcement and raises serious constitutional questions. He warned that allowing federal agents to operate without clear identification creates confusion and fear, particularly in communities already wary of aggressive enforcement tactics.
The senator emphasized that his opposition to the funding bill is not a rejection of border security or public safety, but a stand against what he described as a growing pattern of unchecked federal authority. According to Kelly, accountability must remain a core principle of any law enforcement operation conducted within the United States.
In his post, Kelly also urged citizens who share his concerns to take action by contacting their senators and representatives. He called on Congress to put an end to what he described as increasing chaos in federal enforcement and to ensure that all agencies operate in a manner consistent with American democratic values and the rule of law.
FEDERAL JUDGE SLAMS THE DOOR ON TRUMP’S VOTER SUPPRESSION PLOT — “THE PRESIDENT GETS NO SAY.”
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy says at least 55,000 soldiers have died during fighting four years on from the start of Russia’s invasion, up from the 46,000 troops he said had been killed in early 2025.
THIS ONE IS ON FIRE 🔥 The internet can’t stop arguing over this graphic claiming Sen. Mark Kelly said Trump “hasn’t done anything for the American people.” Hold up — didn’t do anything? Let’s check those receipts. 👀 Supporters immediately point to:
Time to revisit the question. With some distance and perspective, do you support Donald Trump’s decision to move against Venezuelan strongman Nicolás Maduro? Supporters argue it was a firm stand against authoritarianism, corruption, and human rights abuses. Critics warn about escalation and foreign entanglements. Either way, it highlights a broader debate about America’s role in confronting dictators abroad. Where do you stand now? 👇
Kaitlin Collins is a badass. A journalist that’s not afraid to ask pertinent questions and doesn’t allow crooked politicians to demean her. She is also a wonderful role model for young women and girls. That’s way more than we can say about anyone in the White House in 2026.
TRUMP TAKES ON CRIME — AND DELIVERS! 💥 President Trump says his focus is the “2%” who commit the majority of crimes, and targeting repeat offenders is already dropping violence in key U.S. cities.
BREAKING NEWS: U.S. Lumber Tariffs Backfire as Canada Triggers Chaos in America’s Housing Market
Newly released documents reference Donald Trump more than one thousand times, prompting renewed scrutiny of his past social connections. Trump has insisted he was not close to the late financier at the center of the records and denied any wrongdoing.
WASHINGTON ERUPTS: KRISTI NOEM HIT WITH IMPEACHMENT AS HOUSE VOTE IGNITES POLITICAL INFERNO
President Donald Trump suggested he could pursue legal action against author Michael Wolff, alleging that Wolff and the late Jeffrey Epstein were “conspiring” to harm him politically.
