SHOCK PHOTO: Pam Bondi’s notes reveal that the DOJ spied on lawmakers by tracking their searches through the redacted Epstein files and compiling them in Bondi’s book, which she used to help respond to their questions.

SHOCK PHOTO: Pam Bondi’s notes reveal that the DOJ spied on lawmakers by tracking their searches through the redacted Epstein files and compiling them in Bondi’s book, which she used to help respond to their questions.

**SHOCK PHOTO: Notes Allegedly Show DOJ Tracked Lawmakers’ Searches in Epstein Files**

A photo circulating online this week purports to show handwritten notes attributed to former Florida Attorney General Pam Bondi, allegedly revealing that the U.S. Department of Justice tracked lawmakers’ searches within redacted Jeffrey Epstein case files.

According to claims accompanying the image, DOJ officials monitored which sections of the heavily redacted Epstein documents members of Congress accessed or inquired about. The notes, described as being compiled into a reference book used by Bondi, were allegedly intended to help craft responses to lawmakers’ questions regarding the case.

The authenticity of the photo and the accuracy of the claims have not been independently verified. Neither the Department of Justice nor Bondi has publicly confirmed that such tracking took place. Legal experts note that while government agencies routinely log document access in secure systems for record-keeping and security purposes, any targeted monitoring of lawmakers for strategic or political reasons would likely raise significant constitutional and oversight concerns.

The Epstein case has remained a source of public scrutiny and political tension since the financier’s 2019 death while in federal custody. Numerous documents tied to the investigation have been released in redacted form, fueling ongoing debate about transparency and accountability.

As of now, no official investigation has been announced regarding the alleged tracking claims. Observers say further verification will be needed to determine whether the notes reflect routine administrative record-keeping or something more controversial.